Forum

Fucken oath more attractive! I mean, have you even seen that useless piece of flesh on the end of a cock?

I think mine looks better and cleaner, but less sensual.

They say the head of a circumcised dick is less sensitive than an uncircumcised one. Also that the foreskin acts as a sheathe through which the dick glides back and forth during fucking, making for greater comfort for both partners.

I sometimes wish I could experience what I have been missing all these years. And I agree that it's wrong to mutilate an infant's genitals, male or female.

As for aesthetics: I'll leave for that for others to judge.

Sometimes it has to be done for medical reasons as was the case for me. My foreskin wouldn't retract as a child and every time I urinated my penis inflated like a balloon.

Circumcision is not necessarily genital mutilation.

Fucken oath more attractive! I mean, have you even seen that useless piece of flesh on the end of a cock?
....
Oh, you mean a man!

An uncircumcised cock reminds me of a dog's cock.

thats why i wrote ritual, not medical

Yes, more attractive. Also more fun to suck and it feels better than uncut imo. Don't understand what you mean by sensual, perhaps you meant less sensitive... I've heard that but I wouldn't know.

When did circumsizion become customary for Christians? I wonder if it started around/after WWII, being performed by Jewish doctors as a way for them to be less obvious amongst the populace...Hmmmm?

I was cut at age 14. It was medical.
And for me the best thing that could happen.
But i must say it was hurting me a lot.
Never had a normally working foreskin so can't compare.
But i agree, if it isn't nessecary it should be your own choice not , your parents or religion.

See my pics - I can easily leave foreskin over head or pull back - woman's choice whilst she plays with me....

American Christians.............

Less sensitive? I am circumcised and couldn't handle anymore sensitivity.
I like that I am cut. It is kind of like a dress code. What would you prefer, a man in old raggedy clothes or a man in a sharp dressed suit?
In the words of ZZTop "every girls crazy bout a sharp dressed man"

Is this a uncut one ?

Cut at 37, high and tight, the sensations are off the scale for me. I also orgasm with more itensity and can have a chain of up to 3 orgasms over a few minutes, which is something I could never do whilst I had a foreskin. Also had a partial frenelectomy as I had a slight Frenum Breve where the frenelum is to tight. Glad I got the choice and pain relief, something the 8 day old often doesn't get in a ritual Jewish Circumcision.

In general, I prefer the appeal of circumcision. I find it to be both more sensual and more attractive.

So this makes it official. Circumcised men are awesome at sex and their cocks are worshiped by every woman in the world.

I don't care either way as it is personal choice..... But that is my point , it should be an adults choice not xxxxxx on anyone.

i was cut at 8 days like most jews,
im against it n wouldnt do it to my son (when ill have one )

so im with u on that one Artistic

it should b done only by choice...

some guys do have plenty skin, but most i believe dont have much left when fully erect
which is when most of us see them i guess, but the feeling of an cut vs uncut
feels most for me wanking or sucking, i cant say my puss feels the difference

And here I was think my lack of success with the ladies is cause I'm fat & ugly, instead it's just cause I've got a foreskin

Thanks NN for sorting my life

I actually prefer uncut cocks, better for oral and anal!

Personaly, I think all that skin looks weird. My wife prefers circumsized dicks. As far as the skin being there for the head of the cock to glide on.....Pussy lips feel just as good sliding over the head of a cock. No need for foreskin to be blocking that!!!! LOL I guess for jerking off, it would make it easier. My wife would rather use her hand, lips and pussy to stimulate the head of a cock and make it cum tho. Just our