Forum
Location: AU
Posts: 2451
It's got nothing to do with kool aide. Sites like this are becoming increasingly held legally responsible for anything that is posted on them. It's a huge pain in the arse for mods as well, but it's helping to keep the site on line.
It's got nothing to do with kool aide. Sites like this are becoming increasingly held legally responsible for anything that is posted on them. It's a huge pain in the arse for mods as well, but it's helping to keep the site on line.
Why should non paying members and paying members get treated equally?
Make it a premium perk to have pics posted instantly.
And we are still getting the pop ups asking for more money.
If you don't like waiting for your pics to go live, simply don't upload any.
[url]https://www.theverge.com/2021/4/15/22340260/vawa-shield-act-revenge-porn-first-amendment-questions[/url]
Also, what good does running pics by a mod do in regards to non-consensual / revenge? How can they tell?
Do you suppose full ID will be the next shoe to drop? That’s now the case on xhamster though so far they’ve not done what PH did and purge existing content.
Also, what good does running pics by a mod do in regards to non-consensual / revenge? How can they tell?
Do you suppose full ID will be the next shoe to drop? That’s now the case on xhamster though so far they’ve not done what PH did and purge existing content.
Because as a Mod we review each pic before it is allowed to go to the gallery. Non-consensual, if a male profile is posting photos of random women, that might be a case of non-consensual. Revenge pics same thing or maybe they're dumb and put a title to the pic saying my ex or something like that. Also running photos through reverse search does help us catch people stealing photos from other sites trying to pass them off here. So I hope this might answer some of your questions.
And as far as full ID these rules are not done primarily by the owners of the sites it's usually pushed by someone else like credit companies or even by other countries laws regarding internet pornography.
Why do you think premium members are not heard? Because you're premium you think you hold a stake in what this site does? Do you feel you have a voice in what NN does with his site?
Also, what good does running pics by a mod do in regards to non-consensual / revenge? How can they tell?
Do you suppose full ID will be the next shoe to drop? That’s now the case on xhamster though so far they’ve not done what PH did and purge existing content.
Also, what good does running pics by a mod do in regards to non-consensual / revenge? How can they tell?
Do you suppose full ID will be the next shoe to drop? That’s now the case on xhamster though so far they’ve not done what PH did and purge existing content.
But if the photographer shows the person the pic when they wake up and they give permission? It's getting to be a big grey area.
Also, what good does running pics by a mod do in regards to non-consensual / revenge? How can they tell?
Do you suppose full ID will be the next shoe to drop? That’s now the case on xhamster though so far they’ve not done what PH did and purge existing content.
But if the photographer shows the person the pic when they wake up and they give permission? It's getting to be a big grey area.
Also, what good does running pics by a mod do in regards to non-consensual / revenge? How can they tell?
Do you suppose full ID will be the next shoe to drop? That’s now the case on xhamster though so far they’ve not done what PH did and purge existing content.
But if the photographer shows the person the pic when they wake up and they give permission? It's getting to be a big grey area.
It is absolutely not a grey area. If you're showing anyone in your photos that's identifiable i.e. face or tattoos they also need ID verified. And if it's a photo of someone sleeping it would be refused to be published anyway. As a mod a sleeping person gives no consent.