Mentor___01's blog post - To Hair or not to ...

Ok, somebody out here in the World of NN Readership please enlighten me: What law of the universe says women have to be denuded of all body hair to be clean, or attractive, or desirable, or sexy?
Who wrote that law?
Who wrote that we have to have additional elements with which to shame women about being themselves; have to fit one particular image?

An NYC friend once told me the "shaven" thing grew from the porn industry, the reaction to a recurring epidemic of body lice. I can't confirm that as the true basis but it does sound reasonable in its context.
But that's where it stops.

Frankly, I find the cooky-cutter sameness of smoothies to be boring.
Hair does not mean unclean. Hair does not mean unattractive. And hair damn sure doesn't mean repulsive.
No two growths are the same; each being part of that ♀️ individual uniqueness.
Why should she deny her own uniqueness?
Hair provides many avenues to create sensation.
Why should she deny herself of avenues of sensation?
Why should she deny herself at all?

I'm directing this at the topic of pubic hair, but it doesn't stop there. She can have that light mustache growth that mortifies her. She can have pit hair and even leg hair, and still be as desirable as she ever was.

Her independence.
Her uniqueness.
Her sensations.

What am I missing here?